ДСТУ ГОСТ 8.586.2:2009
Завантажити документ
Формат .docx · доступно зареєстрованим користувачам
1 2 4
—? —? —? —? —? —? —? —? —?
8.586.2-
2005
( ISO 5167-2:2003 Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differentia! devices inserted incircular cross-section conduits running full —Part 2: Orifice plates(MOD)
- - - - - - - -
( State system for ensuring the tniformity of measurements. Measurement of liquids and gases flow rate and quantity bymeans of orifice instruments. Part 2. Orifice plates. Technical requirements
1 2
3 4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2
= (n d 2/4) 4.1.3
4.2 5 5.1 5.1.1
5.1.2 5.1.2.1 5.1.2.2 5.1.2.3
-10,5
^^-(0,681- 0,651£?)
Q _ 2 27 v o J a = 0(13,5- 1 /7 — 5.1.3 5.1.3 1
I = D.
5.1.3.2 5.1.3.3 5.1.4 5.1.4.1 5.1.4.2 5.1.4.3 5.1.4.4 5.1.5 5.1.5.1 5.1.5.2 5.1.5.3 5.1.5.4 5.1.6 5.1.6.1 5.1.6.2 5.1.7 5 .1.7.1
5 1.7 2 5 1.7.3 5.1.8 5.1.6.1 5.1.6.2 5.1.8.3 5.1.9 5.1.9.1 - - - - 5.1.9.2 5.1.10 5.2 5.2.1 5.2.1.1 5.2.1.2 5.2.1.3 5.2.1.4
5.2.2 5.2.2.1 5.2.2.2
(0,5 (0,5 + 0,01)0 5.2.2.3 (25,4 (25,4 5.2.2.4 5.2.2.5 5.2.2.6 5.2.2.7 5.2.2.8 5.2.3 5.2.3.1 5.2.3.2
1 —
5 2.3 3 0,0050 < 0,010 < - 1 - 1 - 4 5.2.3.4 5.2.3 5 5.2.3.6 £? 100 < (5.5)
5.2.3.7 5.2.3.8 5 2.3.9 5.3 5.3.1 d > 0,0125 0,050 0,1 <0 £?0,75;
Re > 5Q00 Re d > 0,0125 0,050 0,1 <
(5.9)
D
7,1592- 12,387₽? —(2,0118- 3,4690)lg(Re) +
10 4^mln, + (0,1382 - 0,23762p)[Ig(Re)] 2 D [-0,892353+ 0,24308lg(Re)-0,0162562[lg(Re)] 2 D
' D Re
,t№? mIn 5.3.2.4 (
(5.15)
/- 5.3.3 5.3.3.1 0£? Lfc o =0,5 0,9(0,75 - 5.3.3.2 =3,5~.
5.3.3.3 5.3.3.4
5.4 5.4.1 7 5.4.2 Aw = (1 — 5.4.3 = ( ^- 6 6.1 62 1 7 3,5 S 16 40 20 43 22 47 3 > I — 4 ) 5) / /D = ^^- ( ₽?-p 2 ) + L 2 .
₽?1 - ₽?2
fJ 2 , L 2 —
6.2 2 6 2.3 6 2.4 6 2.5 - - 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 а?) 1) 2) 3)
б?) в?) 1) 2) - - г?)
6.2.9 6.2.10 6.2.10.1 - - - 6.2.10.2 - - - 6.2.10.3 - - -
(22 ♦?
6.3 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.2.1 6.3.2.1.1 0,95DsD f <D.
6.3.2.1.2 6.3.2.1.3
1 — 6.3 2.1.4 6.3.2 2 6.3.2.2.1 6.3.2.2.2 6.3.2.3 6.3.2.3.1 • 30D > L f 2 18D;
-L f Z30D.
6.3.2.3.2 6.3.2.3.3 - - 6.3.2.3.4 - •? - 6.3.2.3.5 6 3.2.4 • -
2) / —. з?) 4) 5) o = L f -L CT — 2,5.
6) 7) 8 >
1 —
6.3.3.1 6.3.3.2 7,50 <.L s <L f -8,50.
6.4 6.4.1 6.4.2 6 4.3 - - - 6.4.4
— < ( 6.4.5 6 4.6 6.5 6.5.1 6.5.2 6 5.3
0,0050
! 0,1 + 2,30 4
0,00250 (6 5)
0,1 + 2,3 0,0050 (6 6)
0,1 + 2.30 4
0,00250 0,0050 (6.7)
0,1+230 4 0,1+2,30 4
6.5.4 S.6 6.6.1 6.6.2 6.6.3
6
( 0,2< 1,1< 0$ 1 <D^D X <: 1,1. ( Dj/D >1,1. ( 0,2 < 1,1 <0^0, 5 2. ( 0sK r 2 0^; ( 1,0 sDj/Oj <51,1. ( DJD 2 >1,1. ( A.3.S
D [0,5 ( D k — D k >On &150
- - - - - - - - А? .8
50 < L s S L r - 8D 60 < 8,50 S L s < L f - 7,50.
[7] Reader-Harris, M.J. and Sattary, J.A. The orifice plate discharge coefficient equation - the equation for ISO 5 167-1. In Proc. Of 14th North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, Peebles, Scotland, East Kilbride, Glasgow, National Engineering Laboratory, October 1996, p. 24
[8] Reader-Harris, M.J. The equation for the expansibility factor for orifice plates. In Proc. Of FLOMEKO 98, Lund, Sweden, June 1998, pp. 209—214
[9] Reader-Harris, M.J. Pipe roughness and Reynolds number limits for the orifice plate discharge coefficient equation. In Proc, of 2nd Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Calgary, Canada, Arlington, Virginia: American Gas Association, June 1990, pp. 29—43
[10] Reader-Harris. M.J., Sattary, JA. and Spearman, E.P. The orifice plate discharge coefficient equation. Progress Report No PR14: EUEC/17 (EEC005). East Kilbride, Glasgow: National Engineering Laboratory Executive Agency, May 1992
[11] Morrow, T.B. and Morrison, G.L. Effect of meter tube roughness on orifice C*. In Proc, of 4th Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Denver, Colorado, June 1999
[12] Urner, G. Pressure loss of orifice plates according to ISO 5167. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8, March 1997, pp. 39—41
[13] Studzinski, W., Kamik, U., Lanasa, P„ Morrow, T., Goodson, D., Husain, Z. and Gallagher, J. White paper on Orifice Meter Installation Configurations with and without Flow Conditlners, Washington D.C., American Petroleum Institute, 1997
[14] Studzinski, W., Weiss, M., Attia, J. And Geeriigs, J. Effects of reducers, expanders, a gate valve, and two elbows in perpendicular planes on orifice meter performance, in Proc, of Flow Measurement 2001 International Conference, Peebles, Scotland, May 2001, ppr 3.1, East Kilbride, Glasgow, National Engineering Laboratory
[15] Weiss, M., Studzinski, W. and Attia, J. Performance evaluation of orifice meter standards for selected T-junction and elbow installations. In Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Washington, D.C., April 2002
[16] [17] Zanker, K.J. and Goodson, D. Qualification of a flow conditioning device according to the new AP114.3 procedure. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 11, June 2000, pp. 79-87
[18] Reader-Harris, MJ. and Brunton, W.C. The effect of diameter steps In upstream pipework on orifice plate discharge coefficients. In Proc. 5th Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Washington, D.C., April 2002
[19] Morrow, T.B. Metering Research Facility Program Orifice Meter Installation Effects; Ten-inch sliding flow conditioner tests. Technical Memorandum GRI Report No. GR/-96/0391. San Antonio, Texas: Southwest Research Institute, November 1996
[20] Kamik, U. A compact orifice meter/flow conditioner package. In Proc, of 3rd Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, San Antonio, Texas, March 1995
[21] Kamik, U., Studzinski, W„ Geeriigs, J and Kowch, R. Scale up tests on the NOVA Flow Conditioner for orifice meter applications. In Proc, of 4th Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Denver. Colorado, June 1999
1 2 З? 4 4.1 4.2 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6
State system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements
Measurement of liquid and gas flow rate and quantity by means of orifice instruments. Part 2.
Orifice plates. Technical requirements
1 2 4 4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2 q m = ( 4.1.3 Q m = q v p = Q c Pc- (4.2)
4.2 5 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.2.1 5.1.2.2 5.1.2.3
1 -
D' - 5 5.1.3.1 . . /SD
■? D H - 2H a /(D-d)<0,005. (5.4)
5.1,3.2 5.1.3.3 5.1.4 5.1.4.1 5.1.4.2 5.1.4.3 5.1.4.4 5.1.5 5.1.5.1 5.1.5.2 5.1.5.3 5.1.5.4 5.1.6 5.1.6.1 5.1.6.2 5.1.7 5.1.7.1 5.1.7.2 5.1.7.3 5.1.8 5.1.8.1 5.1.8.2 5.1.8.3 5.1.9 5.1.9.1 - - - - 5.1.9.2 5.1.10 5.2 5.2.1 5.2.1.1 5.2.1.2 5.2.1.3 5.2.1.4 5.2.2 5.2.2.1 - (0,5 - (0,5
5.2.2.3 - (25,4 - (25,4 5.2.2.4 5.2.2.5 5.2.2.6 5.2.2.7 5.2.2.8 5.2.3 5.2.3.1 5.2.3.2
1 - 5 - j - 5.2.3.3 - 0.005D <. - 0,01 D <. - 1 - 1 - 4 5.2.3.4 5.2.3.5 5.2.3.6
100 < ——-.
D D 0,1 + 2, 5.2.3.7 5.2.3.8 5.2.3.9 5.3 5.3.1 - 0,050 0,1 < Re > 5000 Re > 16000 - d> 0,0125 0,050 0,1 <
5.3.2 5.3.2.1 / I Re
- 0,031 (Af-t -
190000 V Re J2L'
0,011(0,75 - 0)62,8 - —— ) V 0,0254 0 - ( L'z = 0,47;
- . _ , 5.3.2.2
5.3.2.3 Ra max 0,718866- + 0,3 6 4-0,65^+ 4 = -[lg(Re)] , (59)
10 4 . >|5 j~y max
Ra mln 7,1592-12,387 >0-(2,0118-3,469 •₽?) - lg(Re) +
10
37,36 • lg(• lg(^+3,3333 ■? kR))Re
5.3.2.4 ( 0,
— +0,0007773
d 7
z_ 7C n = 0,9826+1— + 0,0007773 | . (5.16)
J
5.3.3 5.3.3.1 U' Co = (0,7 — CZ' o =0,5, U' Ca = (1,6670 - 0,5), D
0,9 (0,75 - 0,0254
5.3.3.2 U' = 3,5—^-.
5.3.3.3
5.3.3.4
U ( 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3
6 6.1
6.2 6.2.1 S- 3) /- 4) 5) 51 7)
Z / O = ^5^(₽?-₽? 2 ) + Z 2 . (6.1)
Pi Pz
L 2 - 6.2.2
6.2.3 6,2.4 6.2.5 - • 6.2.6 6.2.7 6.2.8 а?) 1) 2) 3) б?)
1 - в?) 1) 2) - - 6.2.9
6.2.10 6.2.10.1 - - -
6.2.10.2 - - - 6.2.10.3 - - - 6.3 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.2.1 6.3.2.1,1 0.95D < D f <D .
6.3.2.1.2
7 _ 4 -
6.3.2.1.3 6.3.2.1.4 6.3.2.2 6.3.2.2.1 6.3.2J2.'2 6.3.2.3 6.3.2.3.1 -30D> Lt'S 18D -Lr 2:300.
14,5 7) 2) 1 - 31 4) 51 6) 71 8)
6.3.2.3.2 6.3.2.3.3 - - 6.3.2.3.4 - - - 6.3.2.3.5 6.3.2.4 - -
1 - 6.3.3 6.3.3.1 6.3.3.2 7,50 <L s <L f - 8,50.
6.4 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 - - - 6.4.4 (6-2)
<0,05, (6.3)
D
6.4.5 6.4.6 6.5 6.5.1 6.5.2 6.5.3 0,005.0
£? =
0,00252?
0,1+2,
<- 0,00252? 0,0052)
6.5.4 6.6 6.6.1 6.6.2 6.6.3
Kr = D^D^Di- 1)/ 1, ( Q,2< K r <0,5', ( 1,1< Q<K r <Q,2-, ( 1,0 <D 2 /D l <1,1. ( ^>0,5; ( 0,2 <£?,.<0,7; ( 1,1<D 2 /D, <2. ( 0< 1,0< £?
A.S.3 D k - D k >Dn
- - - - - - - -
5D< L s < L f -80 6D< L s < 8D 8,5D <L s <L f — 7,5D.
[1]
[2]
[4]
[5]
[6]
Pl
[8]
[9]
[ [11]
[12]
[13]
ISO 5167-1:2003 Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure diffeiential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full - part 1: general principles and requirements
( Hobbs, J.M and Humphreys, J.S. The effect of orifice plate geometry upon discharge coefficient. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1, April 1990, pp. 133-140 Reader-Harris, MJ. and Sattary, J.A. The orifice plate discharge coefficient equation - the equation for ISO 5 167-1. In Proc. Of 14th North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, Peebles, Scotland, East Kilbride, Glasgow, National Engineering Laboratory, October 1996, p. 24
Reader-Harris, M.J. The equation for the expansibility factor for orifice plates. In Proc. Of FLOMEKO 98, Lund, Sweden, June 1998, pp. 209-214
Reader-Harris, M.J. Pipe roughness and Reynolds number limits for the orifice plate discharge coefficient equation. In Proc, of 2nd Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Calgary, Canada, Arlington, Virginia: American Gas Association, June 1990, pp. 29-43 Reader-Harris, M.J., Sattary, J.A. and Spearman, Morrow, T.B. and Morrison, G.L. Effect of meter tube roughness on orifice C d . In Proc, of 4th Int. Symp. on Fluid Flow Measurement, Denver, Colorado, June 1999
Urner, G. Pressure loss of orifice plates according to ISO 5167. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8, March 1997, pp. 39-41
Studzinski, W., Kamlk, U., Lanasa, P„ Morrow, T., Goodson, D., Husain, Z. and Gallagher, J. White paper on Orifice Meter Installation Configurations with and without Flow Conditiners, Washington D.C., American Petroleum Institute, 1997
[14] Studzinski, W., Weiss, M.,